Advertisement
July 24, 2008  

[ back ]


Softball clinic change questioned


Following a series of complaints and unpaid fees, the Rutherford Recreation Department switched vendors for its Girls’ Softball Clinic. The change from Lyndhurst-based All Pro Academy to a newly formed group of local softball players left some parents asking "why."

Flyers handed out at Pierrepont School on Jan. 31 advertised the new vendor with a new price. Councilman John Sasso said the price increase was a direct result of a budget cut. The borough had kicked in $3,000 annually to subsidize the price of the former clinic. Also, All Pro Academy owed the town $700 in unpaid fees for the use of recreation fields. All Pro Academy did not use Rutherford fields for the softball clinic.

The department repeatedly demanded payment from All Pro Academy. The company also did not contact the borough about hosting another event. A representative from All Pro Academy did not return phone calls.

Sasso said although finances were a factor in the switch, complaints about the former vendor also paved the way for a change. According to Sasso, parents complained about the ratio of instructors to kids and school custodians noted that clinic instructors arrived late, leaving children unsupervised. Tardiness also cut instruction time short, according to Sasso.

Finally, the individual who ran the camp could often be spotted in the stands convincing parents to pay for private lessons through him, Sasso said. "Those complaints have been consistent for two years," he added.

Recreation Department secretary Barbara Bennett approached Sasso about switching to a group of young women interested in taking over the clinic. The new group, headed by Madlyn Mignone, who assistant coached softball in Rutherford last year, showed enthusiasm for taking over the clinic, said Sasso. "They’re experienced softball players. They’re college level," he said. "Why not take a chance on a different vendor?"

The clinic will cost $100 per student for five 90-minute sessions. The previous clinic cost parents $20 for a total of eight hours of instruction, 30 minutes less than the new clinic. Rutherford charges the organizers of the clinic $10 per participant for all clinics and camps run through the Recreation Department. All Pro Academy had a separate agreement with the former recreation director. Bennett declined to comment on that agreement.

The new instructors include three Rutherford High School graduates and a Queen of Peace High School grad, as well as Mignone. "These girls area all homegrown and they have a passion and a love for the game. You can see it in their eyes," said Mignone.

Two of the instructors, Amanda Jones and Jessica Murden, provide softball instruction through Lefty’s Sports Academy in Clifton. The other two instructors play softball for the recreation league with Mignone.

The group will also offer a free clinic for coaches with former Rutherford High School Softball Varsity Coach Ish Falcon. All of the coaches will be attending a Rutgers Coaches Certification, which the department requires of all coaches, according to Bennett.

Background checks have not been completed for the coaches, as the department does not require them for volunteer coaches. Nonetheless, the borough recently passed an ordinance dictating a code of conduct for recreation sporting events, including a code for coaches, players and people in attendance, said Sasso.

Still, confusion arose when flyers ended up in the take home folders of Pierrepont School students on Jan. 31. George Hughes, a Girls’ softball coach and parent, questioned the department, Sasso and Mayor John Hipp about the switch. After waiting for answers for weeks, Hughes garnered 74 signatures from members of the community demanding answers to his questions about the new clinic.

As of Feb. 12, 15 girls have signed up for the softball clinic. The deadline is Feb. 29. Seventy-one girls signed up last year.

Sasso and Hipp, both sworn into office in January, did not provide him with the answers promptly and the understaffed Recreation Department remained mum on the topic until recently. Hughes believes the absence of a recreation director has put a strain on department operations. "The most glaring thing in this whole situation is that Rutherford Recreation is a mess. They need to get a director in there," said Hughes. "[Bennett] is one person doing the job of many."

The Recreation Department has been without a director since the summer and Bennett is currently the only full-time employee. The previous administration sat on resumes last year, said Sasso. The council will soon reopen the search for candidates and bring former candidates back in to see if they are still interested. In the meantime, the short-staffed Recreation Department has been forced to work very hard, said Sasso.


 

Comments (5)
On February 26, 2008, RecTaxpayer said:

I for one would like to thank Councilman Saso for saving the taxpayers money. In my opioion I don't think our taxe monies should go to a certain few. Is the Borough going to pay some monies for a Little League baseball clinic? I would also like to thank Ms, Bennett for saving the taxpayers money by doing the work of 3 people. This is a lot of nonsense over a clinic for a few hours. I think Mr. Hughes should worry about bigger issues in town.
 
On February 25, 2008, Concerned said:

Finally, there is a mention of the truth in Steve's comments. George and Mary Hughes are making their personal issue an issue for the town as it is affecting our children and our recreation programs. Our recreation department should be commended for all the hard work and dedication. As for All Pro, the recreation department had to release the information that they had from the clinic last year. After George sent his ridiculous e-mail throughout the town, the facts had to come out. All Pro should personally thank George for the publicity. As for Councilman Sasso, he is the recreation liaison. I think we would certainly have something legitimate to complain about if he redirected his attention elsewhere. I definitely agree with Steve's comment about addressing the possibility of George Hughes coaching softball or any other sport in this town. I know that I would not allow my child to participate on any team that he was involved with. The mayor and council needs to decide what is best for our children. If this is the way George acts when things don't go his way, what is next?
 
On February 25, 2008, Steve said:

Maybe the Recreation Dept. should have had All Pro's Clinic back so that parent's that complained last year and were not satisfied with the clinic could have acted as inappropriately as George Hughes is acting. His disgusting accusations that he has been throwing all over town, especially at the recreation functions while children are present, needs to be addressed. He is speaking in a negative manner regarding the new clinic and most people in the town know why. He has made his own personal issue public and is involving many people in the town. I, myself don't appreciate being approached several times at weekend events with my children as he is walking around with his clipboard making people feel very uncomfortable with his petition. Many people are not happy with what George has been doing. However, most people know how to act appropriately as adults and parents. It is to my understanding that George will be coaching a softball team.....that is something that should be addressed by the Mayor and Councilman Sasso.
 
On February 21, 2008, Concerned said:

This is insane! Does anybody really believe that All Pro Academy was in this for the money??? It does not take a rocket scientist to realize that the amount of money paid to them and the level of service provided does not allow for a much profit if any! The nerve of an elected official and un-qualified recreation secretary turned "only rec department personnel" to state anything else is disturbing. I must say that I especially liked the comment "These girls area all homegrown and they have a passion and a love for the game. You can see it in their eyes"- are you for real Mignone? Have you ever looked into the eyes of Joe Mauro- the owner of All Pro??? He is a top HOMEGROWN athlete with a passion for teaching and this town who not only played college ball but was also a professional player. The amount of money that is being charged and the decreased enrollment is the proof positive that a this change was another poor decision. As for Sasso's statement regarding change- I'll remember that at the next election. Although not stated- I have no doubt that All Pro will offer services this summer to students even without the recreation mess. One last point- Ms Bennett mentioned that monies were owed to the department- but yet failed to mention the financial mess the department is in. I did not see it mentioned where residents were refunded money inappropriately and billed inappropriately for recreation services. Maybe Sasso’s attention should be re-directed?
 
On February 20, 2008, All said:

To the Editor: We just thought that we needed to respond to some recent articles that have appeared in the editorial sections of the local papers. All Pro Academy, which is located on Stuyvesant Ave in Lyndhurst, has supported, sports and recreation programs in the tri-state area. For those who have openly praised us in the local media, we appreciate your kind words. However, our desire is to promote, educate and encourage those who want to excel in sports and recreational activity. We, at All Pro Academy are well aware that Councilman Sasso's facts are incorrect and politics play a big decision in his fact finding efforts. We, as with most athletes would rather be kept out of local politics and play ball. Thank you The Coaches & Staff All Pro Academy 222 Stuyvesant Ave Lyndhurst, N.J. 07071 201-460-8258
 

 

[ back ]

 


South Bergenite
33 Lincoln Ave.
Rutherford, NJ 07070
201-933-1166
Kaesu Inc.
Powered By Kaesu
 Copyright 2008