[ back ]
Town considers cell tower sale
(by Daniel O'Keefe - February 20, 2008)
Omnipoint Communications, a wireless technology company, is seeking several variances in order to place a series of cellular antennae on top of an apartment building at the corner of Union and Carmita avenues.
The apartment building contains around 26 units and occupies two lots in an R1 (residential zone). Omnipoint needs to get a use variance to allow a wireless communications facility in a residential area as well as a front yard setback and a building height variance. Omnipoint would need a "d" variance for the height because the proposed antenna height of 55 feet and three inches is over 10 percent in excess of the 35-foot maximum allowable in an R1 zone. The pre-existing building by itself exceeds the allowable height for the area.
Most of the equipment would go on the roof of the building. The project's plans indicate several of the antennae would be disguised to look like chimneys from the ground, according to construction official John Uhl. However, the plan also indicates additional heavy equipment would be placed on the ground behind the building next to an immediately joining private residence on Carmita Avenue.
"The applicant should address how access to the rear of the building will be provided for maintenance vehicles and any potential for interference with fire escapes," according to a letter from former borough engineer Ralph Tango, who reviewed the application when it was first submitted last year. "The placement of the equipment cabinets and the relocation of six bins to the rear property line may have a negative visual impact on the adjoining property."
Fees and payments
The borough doesn't receive any rent or fees for cell towers placed on private property in the borough. However, the increase in the property's value caused by the tower gets factored into the lot's assessment, resulting in a higher property tax intake for the town. Felician College, which otherwise doesn't pay property taxes because it is a religious institution, paid the borough $41,000 in taxes on a particular plot of land that houses a cell tower, according to Rutherford tax collector Caryn Miller. According to Miller, the plot is taxed because the college generates a profit from it.
In addition to the tower at Felician, Rutherford houses several other cell towers on the highways, at the Renaissance Hotel, on Chestnut Street and at the police station.
The cell tower at the police station was built several years ago and is rented by three different companies, Spring Nextel, AT&T Cingular and Omnipoint, according to Rutherford's Chief Financial Officer Ed Cortright. Between the three renters, Rutherford made about $100,000 in fees in 2007. According to Cortright, the companies' contracts with the borough include three-percent annual increases on those fees.
However, last month the New York-based company Wireless Capital Partners proposed an offer to lease the tower for the next 40 years. In exchange, the borough would receive a lump payment of $902,283 up front. If the borough didn't lease the tower and the fees paid by the companies currently renting the tower were to remain constant, the borough could expect to make over $4 million in the next 40 years.
However, Cortright noted that there could be significant technological changes in that time that could make the tower less profitable.
"What happens if this [becomes] obsolete?" asked Cortright. "Forty years ago we had rotary phones and fax machines." The mayor and council are currently considering the proposal.
| Comments (2) |
On February 22, 2008, Valerie said:
Epidemiologists around the world and the US are currently researching the health impacts of these base stations on people living around them. The following symptoms have all been observed: headaches, sleep disturbances, loss of memory, shorter memory in children, brain damages to newborns and young children, cancers.
Faced with a growing number of concerns, the World Health Organization (WHO) and the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), just to mention two official bodies, have requested that high priority be given to additional research.
The wireless industry will tell you that proof has not been made of the negative health effects of cell phone antenna on the population. True, but the opposite has not been proven either, this technology is too new to have reliable statistics! Didn't our country learn from past mistakes like tobacco, asbestos, lead paint....? Are we going to have to wait until our children's brains are damaged? How many cancers will be necessary? Should our elected officials be allowed to gamble with the health of their constituents?
And even if you don't want to buy into the health threat, think about the eyesore that will be created by these six giant "chimneys" on the rooftop and the heavy materials on the ground! The alley between the building and the neighboring property is really small and is already occupied by the trash containers. Where are these trash containers going to go? On the sidewalk??? How about the emergency trucks, plumber trucks and other utilities trucks using this alley?
Furthermore, the building is already higher than allowed in the zoning code!
And let's not forget the tenants of 270 Union Avenue! They were not even aware of the plans! Their safety seems to be of very little importance to their landlord as the emergency exits are also in that alley!
Honestly, after reading the code, I don't even understand why the town would even consider to grant the numerous variances! Wasn't the new administration elected on the promise of offering positive changes to the residents of Rutherford? How can our new Mayor even consider allowing this dangerous eyesore on the West Side?
For all these reasons, we will voice our opinion and request that the plans be rejected at the Zoning Board of Adjustment public hearing on March, 11 2008 at 7:00pm in the Committee of the Whole Room in the Borough Hall at 176 Park Avenue. Please join us!
Valerie
|
| |
On February 20, 2008, Mr. said:
Thank you for your article with regard to the cell towers. The "monstrosities" that the owner of the 270 Union Avenue apartment house wants to have erected on his roof would be immediately next door to my house a 260 Union Avenue and immediately adjacent to my neighbor on Carmita Avenue. We are outraged at the prospect of having these hideous 55+ foot towers next to our homes! If I ever wanted to sell my home, the sight of these towers would be strong deterrent to any potential buyer, not to mention the potential for collapse in a storm, which would cause untold damage to our properties. We are going to attend the March 11th town meeting to voice our strong objection to this construction. We are going to try to encourage all the homeowners in the immediate area to join us in our protest. Respectfully submitted, Mrs. Frances V. Chester, 260 Union Avenue, Rutherford, NJ |
| |
[ back ]
|